Legal Opinion

United States of America, and Spokane Tribe of Indians, Plaintiff-In-Intervention-Appellant v. Barbara J. Anderson, James M. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1984No. 82-3597, 82-3625PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The United States of America appeals a district court’s determination that water rights appurtenant to certain reservation lands which passed out of trust status but which have subsequently been reacquired by the Spokane Tribe of Indians are entitled to a priority date as of the date of reacquisition by the Spokane Tribe. The Spokane Tribe also appeals, urging that the district court erred in holding that the State of Washington had regulatory jurisdiction over use of water by non-Indians on non-Indian land within the Spokane Indian Reservation. We affirm in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Confederated Salish Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. Mark SimonichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Metcalf v. BochcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. FMC v. Shoshone-Bannock TribesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Colville Confederated Tribes v. Boyd Walton, Jr., Et UxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API