Legal Opinion

Albert J. Tooker v. State of Montana and W. J. Estelle, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1971No. 26231Published

1Per curiam

The order dismissing Tooker’s petition for habeas corpus is affirmed.

Tooker has had an evidentiary hearing in the state district court on most of the issues which the federal district court has determined not to disturb. Tooker v. Estelle, decided June 5, 1970, 332 F. Supp. 245.

The deposition point is precluded by Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 88 S.Ct. 1318, 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968). On the transcript point, the request for a transcript came long after the right to take a state appeal had expired. In such circumstances, the right to a transcript is not always automatic. See Hines v. Baker, 422…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Floyd Woodrow Hines v. J. E. Baker, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Tooker v. EstelleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API