Strax Rejuvenation & Aesthetics Institute, Inc. v. Shield
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.
This case is before us on an appeal of a non-final order denying Strax Rejuvenation and Aesthetics Institute, Inc.’s (Strax) Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration. We issued an order to show cause as to why the appeal should not be dismissed because, from the face of the notice, the appeal appeared untimely. See Ruffin v. Kingswood E. Condo. Ass’n, 719 So.2d 951, 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Specifically, the Broward County Clerk of Court’s time stamp on the notice of appeal shows a date of August 21, 2009, which is one day past the thirty-day time limit for invoking the jurisdiction of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ruffin v. KINGSWOOD E. CONDOMINIUM ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Congregation Temple De Hirsch v. AronsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- In Re Amendments to Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Weintraub v. AlterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Knee v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Strax Rejuvenation & Aesthetics Institute, Inc. v. ShieldSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Ocr-EDS, Inc. v. S & S ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Soledispa v. La Salle Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Strax Rejuvenation & Aesthetics Institute, Inc. v. Donna ShieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010