Legal Opinion

Devan v. Bomar

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 2, 2015No. 1625/14PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

In mortgage foreclosure law, as elsewhere, society’s interest in finality and repose is a weighty one. As with statutes of limitations generally, procedural deadlines for raising certain challenges are established and strictly enforced. An unexcused failure to comply with a clear deadline may doom what might otherwise have been a highly meritorious challenge, had it been timely filed. In Bates v. Cohn, 417 Md. 309, 329-30, 9 A.3d 846 (2010), Judge Harrell pointed out why in foreclosure law a time for closing the books with certainty is an economic necessity or is, at least, economically…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Merchants Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. LeBrun v. ProsiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Jones v. RosenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Greenbriar Condominium v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Thomas v. NadelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ahmed v. NewRez LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  2. Mobashera B AhmedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  3. O'Sullivan v. KimmettCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API