Devan v. Bomar
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
In mortgage foreclosure law, as elsewhere, society’s interest in finality and repose is a weighty one. As with statutes of limitations generally, procedural deadlines for raising certain challenges are established and strictly enforced. An unexcused failure to comply with a clear deadline may doom what might otherwise have been a highly meritorious challenge, had it been timely filed. In Bates v. Cohn, 417 Md. 309, 329-30, 9 A.3d 846 (2010), Judge Harrell pointed out why in foreclosure law a time for closing the books with certainty is an economic necessity or is, at least, economically…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schwartz v. Merchants Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- LeBrun v. ProsiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Jones v. RosenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Greenbriar Condominium v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Thomas v. NadelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ahmed v. NewRez LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Mobashera B AhmedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- O'Sullivan v. KimmettCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021