In re Goodhue
New York Court of Common Pleas
Bail
1Opinion of the Court
Riker, Recorder.
Upon a return of the habeas corpus it appears that the prisoner is detained upon three different commitments ; the first''dated the 14th, the second the 17th, and the third the 21st of August, 1816i
The first commitment is under the statute for apr prehending and punishing disorderly persons. 1 R. L. p. 114.. It is signed by Mr. Justice Hedden, and states that Thomas F. Goodhue stands charged before him “ with being a disorderly person—to wit, a person wandering abroad and lodging in taverns, not giving a good ac- ■ i count of himself; whereof he, the said Thomas F. Good-hue,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Van HorneNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Simmons v. VandykeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894