Mayberry v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceJon E Wilcox, J.
¶ 47. (concurring). I write separately because while I agree that the "special circumstances" clause of Wis. Stat. § 402.714(2)1 may not be used to bar Mayberry's claim by calculating damages based on the difference between the market value and actual price of her vehicle at resale, the "special circumstances" clause of § 402.714(2) is still relevant to this case.
¶ 48. Despite Volkswagen's attempt to sustain the circuit court's order for summary judgment, what the parties are really arguing over is the amount of Mayberry's damages. Volkswagen is concerned that the standard method for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of New York v. Pullman Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Hanz Trucking, Inc. v. Harris Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Kuhlman, Inc. v. G. Heileman Brew. Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Thorp Sales Corp. v. Gyuro Grading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Neilson Business Equipment Center, Inc. v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.