Wyodak Resources Development Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This is a pure statutory construction case. The proper construction of the statute, as applied to this case, is not obvious, as evidenced by the fact that the Court of Federal Claims and a district court have both construed the statute differently than we do. In the end, however, we conclude that the language and purpose of the statute are best served by adopting the construction proposed by the appellant.
I
The statute at issue is the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (“SMCRA”), 30 U.S.C. §§ 1201-1328. The Act was designed in part to require coal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Wyodak Resources Development Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wyodak Resources Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017