Legal Opinion

Gazzola v. New

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1935No. 4-3965PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

J. J. New brought suit for malicious prosecution against John Gazzola, the appellant, and J. L. Woodfin. At the conclusion of the testimony the trial court directed a verdict in favor of defendant Wood-fin and submitted the case to the jury against Gazzola. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $200, actual damages, and $1,800, punitive damages, upon which a judgment was entered. To reverse that judgment, this appeal is prosecuted.

Appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant has failed to comply with the provisions of § 1314, Crawford & Moses’ Digest.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kansas & Texas Coal Co. v. GallowaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  2. Foster v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. McIntosh v. Bullard, Earnheart & MagnessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Price v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Whipple v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Farm Service Cooperative, Inc. v. Goshen Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Malvern Brick & Tile Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Thrifty Rent-A-Car v. JeffreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Rogers v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1972
  5. Chicago, R.I. Pacific Ry. Co. v. McCoy Admin.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API