Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Krall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1976No. Appeal, No. 539Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

I concur in the result reached by the Majority because I believe that the Majority’s reasoning is technically unassailable. At the same time, however, I believe that the result is unjust and, therefore, raises a question whether our Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418, 326 A.2d 272 (1974), that abrogated the doctrine of basic and fundamental error in Pennsylvania, must be applied when to do so produces an unjust result.

In the normal course of the judicial process, an appellate court often announces a new rule that is applied only to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API