Legal Opinion

Wilson v. French

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether Serodino, Inc.’s failure to file with the Commissioner of Labor evidence of compliance with the insuring provisions of the workmen’s compensation act was the result of a refusal or wilful neglect that would entitle plaintiff Wilson to pursue a common-law action.

Wilson sued P & B Welding and Fabricating and Serodino, Inc. alleging benefits under the workmen’s compensation laws and *920also that both defendants had refused to comply with the Tennessée workmen’s compensation laws and sought in the alternative a recovery at common law.

The trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dawson Bros. & Beaver, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  2. House v. John Bouchard & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  3. Schroader v. Rural Educational Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Karstens v. Wheeler Millwork, Cabinet & Supply Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Tennessee Insurance Guaranty Association v. Centre Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API