Stokes v. City of Sac City
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from 8ac District Court. — Hon. F. M. Powers, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injury. Verdict and judgment was returned for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The plaintiff claims that while lawfully driving along one of the streets of the defendant city, and being in the exercise of due care on her own part, her horse became frightened by the sight and smell of a wild animal exhibition which defendant had negligently allowed upon said street, with the result that she was thrown from her carriage and severely injured. The defendant denies that it was in any manner negligent with respect to the matters complained of. The evidence tends to disclose facts as follows: It was circus day in Sac City. Following in the trail of the circus was the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kearney Electric Co. v. LaughlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- McCaull v. BrunerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clemens v. Chicaco, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Gates v. City of BloomfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Stokes v. City of Sac CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Stokes ex rel. Stokes v. Gollmar Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.