Legal Opinion

Lacancellera v. New York Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

The plaintiff moves for an order pursuant to rules 112 and 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings, and for summary judgment; and the defendant in turn moves for an order pursuant to rule 113 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

*483The plaintiff claims that on November 1, 1958 he entered into a soliciting agent’s contract with the defendant and that he is entitled to commissions thereunder on applications obtained by him during- the contract period. He also claims that the contract period “ for all purposes ” was from February 16, 1958, that is, nine months…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. DurkinNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API