Legal Opinion

People v. Chase

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [1]) and sexual abuse in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.55), defendant contends that admission of his redacted written statement deprived him of a fair trial because it suggested his commission of other crimes. Defendant failed to object to the People’s offer of the redacted statement, and thus defendant has not preserved his contention for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). We decline to exercise our power to review defendant’s contention as a matter of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. HudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. TasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DillonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. United States v. George MandokaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. People v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Jackson v. ConwayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. DillonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API