Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Malcolm

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The. application, in this case,' is for a writ directed to the judges of the court of common pleas of Madison county, requiring them to come into this court to confess or deny their seals to a bill of exceptions. Upon examining the bill of exceptions, it purports to have been sealed by only two judges. This we think is not sufficient. Not less than three judges can form a court of common pleas. And as the bill of exceptions is not a part of the record, the decision complained of should at least appear to be made by a number which we can judicially notice as constituting a court. To permit a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strader, Perrine & Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API