Legal Opinion
Carr v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 13, 2006No. 5D05-2302PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
917 So.2d 1047 (2006)
Christopher CARR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D05-2302.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
January 13, 2006.
Christopher Carr, Bowling Green, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PALMER, J.
Christopher Carr (defendant) appeals the trial court's order denying his most recent rule 3.800 motion.[1] He again argues that his scoresheet was improperly calculated. Upon review, we conclude that the defendant has exhausted this court's patience and resources because his motion was frivolous and an abuse of process.
In a previous rule 3.800(a) proceeding,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Isley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Simpkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- McBride v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- McCray v. Dept. of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014