Legal Opinion
Fasano v. Hicks
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 16, 1996No. 94-03868PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
667 So.2d 1033 (1996)
Pasquale Enzo FASANO, Appellant,
v.
Henry W. HICKS, P.A., Appellee.
No. 94-03868.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
February 16, 1996.
Dennis R. Long, Palm Harbor, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.
Pasquale Enzo Fasano has appealed from a final summary judgment entered against him and Allen Uter. The judgment holds Fasano liable for principal, interest, costs, and attorney's fees based upon a promissory note modification. Because Fasano raised valid affirmative defenses, we reverse.
It is not necessary to examine the tortured…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Emile v. First National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Harrison v. McCourtneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Canny v. Michael Saunders & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fatherly v. California Federal Bank, FSBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Maung v. National Stamping, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Chen v. Whitney National BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Wendt v. LaskeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Florida Web Printing, Inc. v. Impact Advertising, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.