Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Palmer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

The trial court was of the opinion and the defendants contend that by the terms of the instrument there was created an express trust with no provision for the disposition of the property on the death of the grantor, and that, consequently, by virtue of the provisions of sec. 231.18, Stats., the remainder reverts to his heirs. The statute provides as follows:

“REVERSION in grantor. Whenever an express trust is created every estate and interest not embraced in the trust and not otherwise disposed of shall remain in or revert to the person creating the trust or his heirs as a legal estate.”

Plainti…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Townshend v. . FrommerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In re GallagherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parsons v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  2. Neubauer v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Rikkers v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re Estate of SchaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Keith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API