State v. Neal
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
After the original decision in this case was handed down, defendant engaged other counsel who filed a petition for rehearing, which the court after due consideration has concluded to deny. In doing so we make observation concerning the following points upon which it is urged that a rehearing should be granted.
1. The cross-examination of defendant by the District Attorney concerning previous crimes: This matter was fully briefed on the appeal and was dealt with in the original opinion. While such cross-examination would normally have been error, under the facts of the instant case, it was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. ScottUtah Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. CluffUtah Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by18 opinions
- Alires v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HinesUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Lucero v. KennardUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. JenkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. DodgeUtah Supreme Court · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.