Legal Opinion

State v. Neal

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1953No. 7813PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

After the original decision in this case was handed down, defendant engaged other counsel who filed a petition for rehearing, which the court after due consideration has concluded to deny. In doing so we make observation concerning the following points upon which it is urged that a rehearing should be granted.

1. The cross-examination of defendant by the District Attorney concerning previous crimes: This matter was fully briefed on the appeal and was dealt with in the original opinion. While such cross-examination would normally have been error, under the facts of the instant case, it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ScottUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. CluffUtah Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alires v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. HinesUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lucero v. KennardUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. JenkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. DodgeUtah Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API