Legal Opinion

McNamara v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, McLaughlin, J., and the following memorandum: We merely add that since petitioner’s proceeding was one in the nature of mandamus, the period of limitations commences to run after the respondent’s refusal, upon the demand of petitioner, to perform its duty and not when the determination to be reviewed becomes "final and binding” (CPLR 217). We agree with Special Term that the record as a whole supports the conclusion that petitioner’s job-related accident caused or contributed to his disability in a substantial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Ernest v. Boggs Lake Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Geremski v. Department of FireNew York Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. County of CortlandNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Dembowski v. HannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. White v. County of CortlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Bellerdine v. Department of Fire of AuburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Giorgio v. BucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API