Legal Opinion

People v. Mu-Min

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a conviction, following a bench trial, of criminal mischief in the third degree for intentionally causing damage to property in an isolation cell at the Cattaraugus County Jail. We conclude that the evidence, although circumstantial, was sufficient to establish that defendant intentionally caused the damage (see, People v Dowd, 115 AD2d 557, lv denied 67 NY2d 761). Although defendant testified and denied that he intentionally damaged the cell, this merely raised an issue of credibility which the court, sitting as trier of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. WoodardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. DowdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MirandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. MIRANDA, REYNALDO D., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. MirandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API