Legal Opinion

People v. Jochinsky

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1895No. 21140PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from. an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion. .

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

The information in this case was filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, on the 15th of November, 1893.

It charges that in March, 1893, the defendant and one Alexander Schenkovsky did feloniously and burglariously enter the store of one Morris Prince, known as the TXT; dry goods store, in the city of Santa Rosa, county of Sonoma, state of California, with the felonious intent then and there and therein to commit larceny. IJ further charges that in the commission of the burglary the parties accused did then and there willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haskins v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Kimball v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. CabereraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. People v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. CornellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API