Legal Opinion

Nix v. Scharnagel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1925No. 8 Div. 785PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This was an action in trover by appellants, against appellees. The general affirmative charge was given in favor of the defendants, and from the judgment following the plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.

' The bill of exceptions recites that the defendants filed pleas 1 to 8, upon which plaintiffs took issue. None of these pleas appear in this record, and counsel for appellees take the point that this court will indulge presumption in favor of the ruling of the trial court, and therefore presume that some of these pleas, upon which issue was taken, were established by the proof and justified the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamar v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Doe ex dem. School Commissioners v. GodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Mascott Coal Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Rice v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Cotten v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1863

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allison v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API