Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Midmark Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1997No. 1995-0020PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 2.] THE STATE EX REL. MIDMARK CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS- APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; SERGENT, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Midmark Corp. v. Indus. Comm.,

1997-Ohio-247.] Workers’ compensation—Application for permanent total disability compensation—Surveillance videotape evidence submitted by employer at hearing—Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in not requiring commission specialist to view the videotape and in relying on the commission specialist’s report…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Midmark Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lawson v. ForgeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel Kirkendall v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Frazier v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Wayne Dalton Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API