Legal Opinion · Dissent

E.W. Bowman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 2004Published

1DissentJustice Newman

I believe that the Commonwealth Court incorrectly interpreted Section 306(e)(8)(vi) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), 77 P.S. § 513(8)(vi), to prevent apportionment of costs between multiple insurance companies, merely because that section permits only an “employer” to assert divided liability. E.W. Bowman, Inc. v. WCAB (Wilson), 809 A.2d 447, 451-2 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). Section 305(a)(1) of the Act states that

Every employer liable under this act to pay compensation shall insure the payment of compensation in the State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, or in any insurance company, or mutual…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. E.W. Bowman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API