Legal Opinion

James O'BOyle v. United States of America, Frank Orth & Associates

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 11, 1993No. 92-4032PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYER, Senior Circuit Judge:

O’Boyle appeals the dismissal of his amended complaint against the United States for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6). In his amended complaint, he alleged that he was injured as a result of his slip and fall on a Japanese fishing vessel. He sought relief under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688 and the Federal Employees Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 8101-8193 (FECA), and made claims for maintenance and cure, wages and travel expenses, negligence and emotional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Guidry v. South Louisiana Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Ruth Durrett v. Housing Authority of the City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Cambrian Consultants (CC) America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Eckert v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
  3. Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. James O'BOyle v. United States of America, Frank Orth & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Keller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API