Ex parte Marinaro
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The undisputed facts set forth in the petition for the writ of habeas eorpus last granted, show sufficient cause for its allowance. The bail bond on the first writ was on file in the office of the clerk of this court and was of continued force during the delay of the hearing thereon." The sureties were, so to speak, relator’s jailors. They were his custodians, subject to his surrender and obedience to the orders of the court. Reese v. U. S., 9 Wall. 13, 19 L. Ed. 541. His crossing Niagara River to Canada on August 17, 1921, and his return on the same day, in view of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States Ex Rel. Claussen v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Weedin v. Banzo OkadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- United States ex rel. Claussen v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- In re HersvikDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Siegel v. ReimerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- United States ex rel. Williams v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1933