Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberta Dupre, Beverly Stambaugh

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 6, 2006No. Docket 05-2223-CR(L), 05-2272-CR(CON)PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.

We consider here a claim of a prejudicial variance from an indictment for wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and the role a victim’s religion may play in a sentencing judge’s application of United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”) § 3A1.1 (b) (authorizing increased sentences for those committing crimes against a “vulnerable victim”).

Defendants Roberta Dupre and Beverly Stambaugh appeal from an amended judgment of May 26, 2005, entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denise Cote, Judge) following…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. SabhnaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. RommyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API