Legal Opinion
City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 20, 2009No. DOCKET NO. A-5501-06T2PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.
The City of Philadelphia (City) appeals from the September 16, 2008, order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB), which dismissed the City’s exceptions to a hearing examiner’s Proposed Decision and Order (Proposed Order) and made the Proposed Order absolute and final. We affirm.
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 33 (AFSCME), is the exclusive bargaining representative for nonprofessional City employees. Local 159, Chapter B, represents City guards and other City correctional employees. 1 On October 31,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Office of Admin. v. LABOR REL. BD.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- State System of Higher Education v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Employes v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Goslin v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lancaster County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- AFSCME District Council 33 v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2013
- In Re Formation of Independent School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re Formation of Independent School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011