Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yanhko v. Fane

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 7, 1976Published

1DissentPashman, J.

Because of its periodic and persistent recurrence, the question posed by this case — whether an abutting commercial landowner is liable for a pedestrian’s injuries from a defective or dilapidated sidewalk — may truly represent a legal albatross of this Court. In affirming dismissal of plaintiff’s cause of action, the majority relies on precedents supporting the proposition that a landowner does not incur liability, even when the landowner is aware of the existing condition and its danger to those who use the sidewalk. While I appreciate the guidance which is afforded by precedents, I am…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lahr v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Office Employes International Union, Local No. 11 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Cooley v. Makse's Tavern & Illinois Valley Realty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Klaber v. LakenanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Culver v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API