Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1993No. 2-92-141-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

The appellant, Gerald Wayne Hill, was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than 14 years of age and of indecency with a child. On appeal he challenges several trial court rulings admitting evidence and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt on the indecency with a child charge. We sustain Hill’s first four points concerning admitted evidence of extraneous offenses because it was not admissible under Tex.R.CRIM.Evid. 404(b); we overrule his fifth point because the evidence concerning the incident charged in the indictment was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Vernon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Boutwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Self v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. C.F. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Nelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  4. John Savedra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. John Savedra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API