Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Churchill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1896No. 6270PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Washington county. Tried below before Scott, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The original plaintiff in this canse, John D. Thomas, and one of the defendants, John P. Thomas, have died *267during its pendency, and tbe action bas been revived in tbe name of Julia Thomas, administratrix of tbe estate of tbe deceased plaintiff, and against tbe administrator of the deceased defendant. A petition was filed March 7, 1891, and an amended petition May 25, 1891, in which it was stated, in substance, that tbe plaintiff was, and for many years bad been, tbe owner of 200 acres of land in Washington county, Nebraska, giving a specific description of tbe land, which we omit; that be bad…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monroe v. Reid, Murdock & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Nunez v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hansen v. BerthelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Woodard v. BairdNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Beatrice Paper Co. v. Beloit Iron WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pollard v. McKenneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Spaulding v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Nebraska Land, Stock-Growing & Investment Co. v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Jones v. DanforthNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API