Legal Opinion

People v. Whyte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct are for the most part unpreserved. In any event, review of the record indicates that the prosecutor’s conduct of the trial did not deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). When viewed in context, the prosecutor’s summation comments for the most part constituted appropriate response to the defense summation (People v Marks, 6 NY2d 67, cert denied 362 US 912), and fair comment on the ev*396idence, presented within the broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument (People v Galloway,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. TopsyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re Hui H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API