Legal Opinion
Central National Bank v. Bernstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 28, 1988No. 5762PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff1 in an action to recover on two promissory notes. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in permitting the plaintiff to prove lost original notes by claimed photostatic copies, (2) in concluding that the defendant was personally liable on the notes, and (3) in awarding counsel fees without proof of same.
The plaintiff had alleged that the defendant was indebted to it as evidenced by two notes. One note was for $5000 and was dated July 23, 1982, and the other was for $10,000 and was dated August 2, 1982. Neither note had been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Tropical Ornamentals, Inc. v. ViscontiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Nulman v. WeillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. MIF Realty L.P. (In Re Perrysburg Marketplace Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Amity Partners v. Woodbridge Associates, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Central National Bank v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kaplan v. Ivey, No. Cv94 0140586 S (Mar. 23, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995