Commonwealth v. Rosenblatt
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
The case was submitted on briefs.
1Opinion of the CourtRxtgg, C. J.
At the trial of the defendant, upon this complaint which charged him with failing to contribute reasonably to the support of an illegitimate child, the mother, a married woman, was allowed to testify that her husband had deserted her more than three years before the child was begotten, that she had not seen him since and that the defendant was the father of the child. There was also some evidence tending to show that the husband whs in Europe.
It has been said that apart from statute parents are not permitted to give testimony to make spurious the issue of the mother born in lawful wedlock.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Inhabitants of Abington v. Inhabitants of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Koffman v. KoffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ReillyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Commonwealth v. CircoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- McLaughlin v. Municipal Court of Roxbury DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Sayles v. SaylesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Commonwealth v. KitchenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.