Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Baker

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1999No. 2980200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shelby Dee Baker sued his employer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., to recover workers' compensation benefits. After conducting a trial, the circuit court entered an order finding Baker permanently and totally disabled and awarding benefits accordingly. Wal-Mart appealed.

The Alabama Workers' Compensation Act provides that "[i]n reviewing pure findings of fact, the finding of the circuit court shall not be reversed if that finding is supported by substantial evidence." Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-81(e)(2). In interpreting the term "substantial evidence," the Supreme Court of Alabama has stated:

"[U]nder the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Crawley; Concurrence · Robertson.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Ex Parte St. Regis Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. GreenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. FOVIL MFG. CO., INC. v. WattsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Patterson v. Liz Claiborne, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Patterson v. Liz Claiborne, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API