Evans v. Muller
Supreme Court of Missouri
Ajjpeal from St. Louis Lcmd Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court. I. The affidavit was sufficient. Whatever defect there might have been in it was cured after verdict. (2 R. C. 1855, p. 1256, § 19.)
1Opinion of the CourtRvland, Judge
This is a suit under the landlord and tenant act of St. Louis county. The only question we shall notice is that arising on the defendant’s motion to arrest the judgment be*196•cause the plaintiff’s affidavit is insufficient. The affidavit is as follows: “ State of Missouri, county of St. Louis, ss. Asa S. Jones, agent for Augustus H. Evans, being duly sworn, on his oath says that Casper Müller is the occupant of a certain lot of ground situate on the east side of Carondelet street, in a fractional block, bounded west by said Carondelet street, north by Wood street, and east by Short street, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Willi v. PetersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe ex dem. Hughes v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885