Knopfler v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner’s assertion that an unnamed NYCHA employee assured him that moving out of his public housing apartment would have no effect on his priority for a voucher cannot estop the agency from revoking petitioner’s priority. Indeed, no discretion was involved in NYCHA’s determination that petitioner lost his priority when he vacated the apartment, as this determination was mandated by the agency’s policies (see Matter of Muhammad v New York City Hous. Auth., 81 AD3d 526, 527 [2011]; see also Matter of Cahill [Rowan Group, Inc. — Commissioner of Labor], 79 AD3d 1514, 1514-1515 [2010]).
We have…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Muhammad v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010