Legal Opinion

Schmikler v. Petersime Incubator Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 16, 1949No. Civil Action No. 6359Published

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

The defendant has asked the Court to review the decision of Judge Healey which denied a motion to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. D.C., 77 F.Supp. 11. This request is based upon two recent decisions of the Court of Appeals of this Circuit, Pulson et al. v. American Rolling Mill Co., 1 Cir., 170 F.2d 193, and Kelley v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 1 Cir., 170 F.2d 195.

The defendant’s usual place of business is in Ohio and it maintains no factory, warehouse, office, or store in Massachusetts; it does not display its name on any place of business in Massachusetts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  2. Kelley v. DelawareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  3. Schmikler v. Petersime Incubator Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API