Legal Opinion
In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Erisa
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 2, 2009No. 07-3369, 08-3025, 08-3545, 07-3491, 08-3430PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in this appeal are fourteen individuals who retired from Unisys Corporation (Unisys) between 1987 and 1989. These individuals were originally employed by Burroughs Corporation (Burroughs) which merged with Sperry Corporation (Sperry) in September 1986 to form Unisys. In 1992, after the plaintiffs had retired, Unisys announced the elimination of its preexisting retiree medical benefits plans and the implementation of a new medical benefits plan effective January 1, 1993. Although this case carries with it a complicated procedural history…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Connie Edmonson v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- National Security Systems, Inc. v. IolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Renfro v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Santomenno Ex Rel. John Hancock Trust v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co. (U.S.A)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Amara v. CIGNA Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.