Stallings v. . Walker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Akpeal by defendant from Shaw, J., at February Term, 1918, of' ROCKINGHAM. Tbis is a petition for partition, certified to tbe court at term and'. tried upon issues before a jury. From tbe verdict and judgment tbe defendant appealed.
1ConcurrenceAlleN, J.
I think the judgment of the Court, is correct, but I do not agree to the statement that the assent of the husband to the conveyance of the land of the wife “need not be by deed.” It is expressly held otherwise in Ferguson v. Kinsland, 93 N. C., 337 Jackson v. Beard, 162 N. C., 109; Warren v. Dail, 170 N. C., 406; Graves v. Johnson, 172 N. C., 178; Hensley v. Blankinship, 174 N. C., 760, and the cases cited in the opinion do not support the proposition, as none of them have any relation to a deed for land. The subject-*325matter of Jones v. Craigmiles was a note; of Jennings v. Hinton, an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warren v. . DailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Ferguson v. . KinslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Jackson v. BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Graves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916