Legal Opinion

Pye v. Cardwell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1915No. 6864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.

Appellee brought this suit against appellants, and for cause of action alleges: That on October 8, 1909, she borrowed from defendant Pye the sum of $30, for which she executed her note, to be paid December 1, 1909; that said Pye exacted of her the sum of $15 on said loan in addition to 10 per cent, per annum interest thereon, and said note also provided for the further sum of $25 as attorney’s fees, if placed in the glands of an attorney for collection; that be-fbre-\ the maturity of said note said Pye claimed to have transferred same to one S. Beck: that said claim of transfer was not in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Runge v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Haldeman v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Biering v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Johnson v. King & DavidsonTexas Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Luce v. Interstate Adjusters, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  2. Castleman v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. Keeland Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. A.G. Services, Inc. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Morris v. McCallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API