Quakenbush v. Quakenbush
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Justice.
1. During the trial, several tape recordings were offered in evidence by the plaintiff husband. As to one such recording the defendant objected because the person who made such recording had not testified. This objection was sustained and later, when this person who operated the recording device was called as a witness, the tape recording was played without objection. Other grounds of objection were raised for the first time after verdict and do not present any issue for determination on appeal. Compare Salem v. State, 228 Ga. 186 (3) (184 SE2d 650), and cits.(a) One…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Salem v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Thompson v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Benn v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Connell v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Roswell Road-Perimeter Highway Liquor Store, Inc. v. SchurkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.