Rush v. Smith
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, J.,
on rehearing. In a petition for rehearing the appellees make the point that even if our decision is correct the transfer of stock should be set aside only with respect to the appellant’s one-third interest. The case of Bell v. Wilson, 52 Ark. 171, 12 S. W. 328, 5 L. R. A. 370 (1889), is cited for the proposition that a fraudulent conveyance is nevertheless good not only between the parties but also against all the world except the defrauded creditors.
A statute adopted after the decision in the Bell case has been interpreted to reflect a legislative intention to assist…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Moore v. WaldsteinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Ives v. IvesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Investors Life Insurance v. TudorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978