Legal Opinion

Rush v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1965No. 5-3611PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, J.,

on rehearing. In a petition for rehearing the appellees make the point that even if our decision is correct the transfer of stock should be set aside only with respect to the appellant’s one-third interest. The case of Bell v. Wilson, 52 Ark. 171, 12 S. W. 328, 5 L. R. A. 370 (1889), is cited for the proposition that a fraudulent conveyance is nevertheless good not only between the parties but also against all the world except the defrauded creditors.

A statute adopted after the decision in the Bell case has been interpreted to reflect a legislative intention to assist…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  2. Moore v. WaldsteinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Ives v. IvesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Investors Life Insurance v. TudorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API