Legal Opinion

Plains Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Soillcom, Inc., Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 22, 1971No. 24246PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a licensee of UHF television stations in Springfield and Champaign, Illinois, challenges an order issued in rule making by the Federal Communications Commission which assigned a VHF television channel to Mt. Vernon, Illinois. There is, of course, no question of signal impairment but only of potentially adverse economic impact. No procedural shortcomings in the Commission’s proceedings are asserted, and the central claim is that the Commission’s action is inconsistent with its announced policy not to discourage UHF development by the intrusion of VHF. In this regard petitioner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. WCOV, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Wcov, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Central Alabama Broadcasters, Inc., and Selma Television Incorporated, Intervenors, Intervenors. Montgomery Independent Telecasters, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Central Alabama Broadcasters, Inc., and Selma Television Incorporated, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API