Legal Opinion

In re Defense Plant Corp.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided January 17, 1945No. 555Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, District Judge.

Petitioner, Defense Plant Corporation, in this proceeding seeks exoneration from, or limitation of, liability as owner of DPC 9 Inland and DPC 24 Inland, which were involved in a collision with the fender system and bridge of Apalachicola Northern Railroad Company across the Apalachicola River (Gulf Intracoastal Waterway) in the State of Florida, on February 11, 1943. The barges, which were unmanned at the time, were being towed astern on a hawser in charge of the tug Mars and crew of the charterer, Butcher-Arthur Company, and were approaching claimant’s bridge when…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. The Eugene F. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Navigation Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Hanrahan v. Pacific Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API