Hicks v. First National Bank in Dalhart

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Hicks has filed a motion for rehearing. By his first point of error, he contends that we erred in holding that he failed to preserve error concerning his theory of abandonment. By his second, third, and fourth points of error, he contends that we erred in holding that Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 34.001 (Vernon 1986) is controlling over Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 31.006 in determining when a judgment becomes dormant. We will overrule the motion for rehearing.

Advancing his first point of error, Hicks notes that Middleton v. Murff, 689 S.W.2d 212, 213 (Tex.1985)…