Legal Opinion
Solow v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 26, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment (denominated an order) of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 28, 1977, which granted petitioners’ motion for a statement by the lienor under section 38 of the Lien Law, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to require lienor to supply, solely to petitioner Solow Development Corporation, an itemization only of those extras still at issue, totaling $26,531.71, the balance remaining in dispute, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Section 38 of the Lien Law does not establish an absolute right to a detailed statement from a lienor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- 819 Sixth Ave. Corp. v. T. & A. Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- In re BoryskoNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Pinckney v. Ocean Home Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- DePalo v. McNamaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re Burdick Associates Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. SolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. SolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Associated Building Services, Inc. v. Pentecostal Faith ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.