Horton v. State

There were two counts in the indictment, the first count charging the manufacture of prohibited liquors and the second count charging the possession of a still.

There was ample evidence to support the verdict of guilty. However, the bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence, and this court will on appeal presume that there was testimony to justify the conviction, and all the rulings of the primary court if under any state of proof they would be free from error. Montgomery & Eufaula Ry. Co. v. Kolb & Hardaway, 73 Ala. 396, 49 Am. Rep. 54; Sanders v. Steen, 128 Ala. 634, 29…