Hokamp v. Hagaman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Cross Appeals from the Orphans’ Court of Howard Comity. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
Conrad and Margaret Hagaman were duly married, and lived together as' husband and wife for a long time.
In June, 1867, a decree was passed by the Circuit Court for Howard county, divorcing them a mensa et thoro ; and it was further decreed, in accordance with an agreement of the parties, through their solicitors, that Hagaman pay to his wife the sum of $ 1,676, in full of all arrears for counsel fees and alimony, which shall also free him from any obligation to contribute to her support in the future, and release all claims •of his wife for dower and thirds in any property now held, or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coomes v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1819
- Griffith v. Griffith's ExecutorsGeneral Court of Virginia · 1798
3Cited by26 opinions
- Knabe v. KnabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Kaouris v. KaourisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Henrie v. HenrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Freeman v. BelferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Domain, Ex'r of Estate of Naylor v. Bosley, Indiv. and Adm'x DbnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.