Legal Opinion

Slavin v. Rasch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2007No. ED 89048Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Stuart Slavin and Daniel Lieberman appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of David J. and Diane Har-ter, Pacific Indemnity Co. and Chubb & Son, Inc. (Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondents were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisher v. ShultsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007